Tuesday, May 19, 2009

pawlenty plans to veto medicinal marijuana bill

After major bipartisan efforts by lawmakers, the Minnesota State Legislature passed a bill yesterday which would be the first step in legalizing medicinal marijuana in the state. Sadly, Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty has made it clear that he will veto the bill, effectively shattering the hopes of thousands of patients suffering from chronic illnesses in the state. Pawlenty's promise to veto the bill is another jarring example of a politician who is more concerned with his image than with the people he supposedly serves.

Unfortunately the final version of the bill which was passed would have done little to truly help suffering patients. In fact, the bill limits the use of medicinal marijuana to terminally ill patients, effectively preventing its use by thousands of patients suffering from other chronic illnesses. Furthermore, cancer patients wishing to treat chemotherapy-related nausea would be denied access to medicinal marijuana. Finally, the bill prevents terminally ill patients from growing their own marijuana, making accessibility a major issue.

Regardless of these drawbacks, the enactment of the bill would be a major step towards real marijuana policy reform in Minnesota. Hundreds of studies have made it clear: marijuana has medicinal uses. For this reason 13 states in the U.S. have already legalized medicinal marijuana. Pawlenty's promise to veto the bipartisan bill not only goes against the demands of progressive Minnesotans, but once again shows the Republican party's inability to see through the social taboos which have led to their continuous failures in recent years.

Free up the herb,
Jeet

1 comment:

  1. The main problem facing real progression towards marijuana legalization is its continued status on the Federal level as a Schedule 1 drug which dates back to the Controlled Substance Act of 1970.

    Legalization of Marijuana faces a lot of hurdles other than just Pawlenty. The federal government would need to apply incredible pressure on the DEA to reschedule the drug. In addition to this, the Supreme Court is also another road block; individuals legally allowed to use marijuana in states such as California are still subject to prosecution by the federal government as established by Gonzales vs. Raich in 2005.

    The DEA won't reschedule the drug due to the fact that it would lose a large percentage of funding. The Legislative Branch won't legalize it, and no president coming any time soon, especially in their first term will be willing to risk a legitimate attempt at legalization.

    Just hope that Newt Gingrich doesn't get his way anytime soon (H.R. 4170).

    ReplyDelete